Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Lego" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2011, 4:57 am by Adrian M. Baron
 Of course, there are plenty of people who really love legos. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of guilt: Garcia v Google… [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
IP: the "no-patents round-up for non-techie people" -- today's conference organised by CLT and hosted in London's Grange Fitzrovia Hotel -- was opened by James Tumbridge (Pillsbury), speaking on trade mark and trade dress protection. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm by Ben
Lego Wins Its First Copyright Court Case in China Against BelaLego A/S, Europe’s biggest toymaker, said it won its first copyright court case in China.The China Shantou Intermediate People’s Court has ruled that products under the name Bela, sold by two Chinese companies, infringed upon Lego’s copyrights, the building block maker said in a statement Thursday. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 11:41 am by Neumann Law Group
The Michigan Supreme Court recently considered the scope of immunity provided for governmental entities and employees by the firefighter’s rule in Lego v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 11:41 am by Neumann Law Group
The Michigan Supreme Court recently considered the scope of immunity provided for governmental entities and employees by the firefighter’s rule in Lego v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
  I think this story grabbed my attention largely because I love Lego – I did as a child and now I relive the fun of Lego construction with my children. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
He then addressed the major changes ahead for European patent system users, whether they are applying for patents or litigating them.The discussion then shifted to the protection of product shapes post-patents, considering the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-299/99 Philips v Remington and the LEGO decision (Case C-48/09 P) where the court said at [46] When the shape of a product merely incorporates the technical solution developed by the… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 3:32 am
  Much of the movie, according to my first grader, is straight from Lego Star Wars. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Highlights this week included: Lego brick cannot be registered as a trade mark, rules ECJ: Lego Juris v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:18 pm
 For the record, earlier Sky v Avalon interim injunctive relief litigation, here, was the subject of a helpful guest Katpost by Gill Grassie, here.Hot technology: a car batterythat fits your LEGO set? [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]