Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Mays"
Results 221 - 240
of 43,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
But how does one in fact apply the thing to people who've been in custody the whole time? [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 3:16 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am
Sebelius may be the undoing of the challenge in King v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:09 am
One especially memorable case was Finkel v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
To prove that they guy was, in fact, a gang member, and hence may be subject to a gang enhancement.I can only imagine what a visitor from another planet would think of all this stuff. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm
Along with the ACLU, we challenged the law and won core protections for internet rights in a Supreme Court case, Reno v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 2:17 pm
People v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:15 pm
(Judge Chhabria may, I believe, be a month or so younger, but still). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
Over the weekend I wrote about Lodi v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
Our discussion of the People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 8:24 am
The People's Republic of Bangladesh v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
Water that is diverted for purposes of irrigation, however, 'is not deemed severed and thus remains [realty]' (13 Witkin, supra, § 91, p. 113); 'In the case of water for irrigation, delivered in ditches or pipes, the severance does not take place at all'.In a usually overlooked part of People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
Juror John V. himself was convicted of DUI by plea. . . . [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 9:17 am
...at least, given the range of the people and entities on the wrong side of the "v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:25 am
R (Baia and another v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:11 pm
In VanDussen v Court of Appeals, the Michigan Supreme Court directed the Court of Appeals to “articulate the reason why ‘the fair administration of justice’ warrants the denial of plaintiff’s request to film oral argument on May 10, 2011” in People v Anderson, COA No. 300641, a medical marijuana case. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:49 am
Others would perceive the opposite.Ultimately the plaintiffs don't get any relief.But they definitely had neutral people hear and think about their case.A lot. [read post]
