Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Mosley"
Results 101 - 120
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
But should comment be as legally free on people’s private lives? [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
They accept these people as role models and brand ambassadors. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
He added: “The only people I think need privacy are people who do bad things. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
Around 2,900 people have contacted the police to ask if their voicemails have been hacked. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm
” Antony White QC Opinion: “Defamation and False Privacy” – Hugh Tomlinson QC Is following people illegal? [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Which Core Participant at the Leveson Inquiry did not complain about people watching him in bed with a QC’s daughter this year and why? [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
The Kyiv Post was successful in a “libel tourism” case brought by businessman Dimitry Firtash in respect of a story downloaded by 21 people in England. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
That is how it was put, only six months ago, in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom (App No 48009/08), 10 May 2011. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Preston, R (on the application of) v Wandsworth Borough Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 3174 (Admin) (01 December 2011) December 1, 2011 High Court: Removal of voting rights for people who leave UK for over 15 years not contrary to EU freedom of movement law, although could in principle if rules “unjustifiably interfere with the freedom of movement”. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
“There already is a rather strong regulation against hacking people’s telephones – the law. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:15 pm
Some courts have not been so trusting, such as People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
The article, which appeared in The People, had wrongly alleged she was to be investigated over allegations of slavery. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:46 am
Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 96 (1972). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:02 am
., what people say and think about you. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:59 am
This is a tactic that was exposed in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB): the figure offered by News of the World to ‘Woman E‘ was £25,000 but she only received £12,000 after she delivered the video material. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm
. “Identifiable” material would be treated differently from “non-identifiable” content, with the aspiration “that, over time, people will pay less attention to and take less notice of material which is anonymous”. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
Ferdinand v Mgn Ltd (Rev 2) [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) – Read judgment In the first “misuse of private information” trial against a newspaper since Max Mosley in 2008, Mr Justice Nicol dismissed a claim brough by England and Manchester United footballer Rio Ferdinand against the “Sunday Mirror”. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm
Judgment was handed down today in the case of Ferdinand v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 2454 (QB)). [read post]
