Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Nelson" Results 101 - 120 of 735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2013, 8:33 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
The lineup is as follows.Sept 18: Daniel Ernst, Professor of Law, Georgetown University, “Chief Justice Hughes and Administrative Law, 1930-1941”Comment: Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, Harvard Law SchoolSept 25: Karen Tani, Assistant Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley Law, “The ‘Indian Problem’: Welfare, Rights, and Citizenship in the Wake of the New Deal”Comment: Lucie White, Louis A. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:47 am
Nonetheless, the 9th notes, people change beliefs. [read post]
29 May 2008, 12:11 pm
Kettleson In 1996, people across the country fell in love with Tom Cruise as the idealistic, hardworking sports agent, Jerry McGuire. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Rarely do people become so exasperated with each other that they sense no way out but physical conflict. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:05 pm by Joe Patrice
[Huffington Post] * Next week, the Court will hear argument on EPA v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 6:29 pm
Randall Hodgkinson won in State v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
But then there are two previous judgments on this issue, which the Upper Tribunal then turns to: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Nelson and Fife Council (2014) UKUT 525 (AAC) (our report here) and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Glasgow City Council and IB (2017) CSIH 35 (our report here). [read post]