Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price" Results 201 - 220 of 4,781
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2023, 4:52 am by centerforartlaw
This type of scam is known as rug pulls—the latest form of fraud where developers trick people into investing in a project and then steal their digital tokens. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The Arkansas Supreme Court explained the effect of fraudulent inducement in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm by Karen Tani
Hibbs (2003), as well as the leading Title VII sex-stereotyping case Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:03 pm by Ilya Somin
The best example is exclusionary zoning, as regulatory restrictions on housing construction price millions of lower-income people out of areas where they could otherwise find greater opportunity…. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
As Europeans, we would like to rejoice at the prospect of witnessing the EU progressing towards an “ever closer union among the peoples of Europe” with a unified patent law under a unitary title and  a jurisdiction with transnational competence for patent litigation. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am by Paige Collings
For example, some lower-priced technologies collect more data than other technologies, such as inexpensive smartphones that come with preinstalled apps that leak data and can’t be deleted. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:01 am by Anthony Sanders
In another, a barber and a dry cleaner in Alabama won their right to offer services below a minimum price set in a New Deal-era price-fixing scheme. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:48 pm
Portillo claim that at the trial, the only evidence of this fact came from nonadmissible hearsay, when the warehouse manager testified at trial that these were the prices he saw when he looked up the dumbbells online.Resulting, today, in a 45-page opinion that an evidence professor would drool over, in which Justice Feuer thinks that the testimony was admissible nonhearsay for one reason, whereas Justice Segal believes that it is admissible nonhearsay for a different reason. [read post]