Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price" Results 301 - 320 of 4,781
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2009, 11:02 am
Approximately 1,350 people had complained to the CPSC that one or both sides of the Rainforest play yard had collapsed. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 11:54 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Tenancies are becoming more and more the norm, as house prices soar way beyond the means of most people. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Here are some links relevant to this Viacom v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And the Court paid a heavy price for its disobedience to the Constitution’s text, history, structure, and correctly decided precedent: The first ruling that deviated from Hylton—Pollock v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Trying to find domains in which people can easily imagine approach v. avoidance. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am by Eric Goldman
Then again, from 1-800 Contacts’ perspective, $15M is a small price to pay for the ability to charge supra-competitive prices to consumers for 15+ years. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
That's the price of being on the wrong side of a lawsuit; e.g., doing something wrong.But it still seems strange that you gotta pay costs for an appeal that you didn't initiate and didn't even fight -- and that you gotta pay 'em even even in the even you prevail on the merits on remand. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:58 am by Eric Goldman
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
Justice Mosk does a wonderful job writing a seventeen-page "UCC For Dummies" primer precisely for people like me. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
Maybe in particular cases that results in error, but that's the price of an otherwise good system.So I agree with the reversal here. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:15 am by Julie Lam
On May 18, 2010, the Court of Appeals issued its per curiam opinion in People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Daniel Shaviro
 In a class that is coming up soon, we will be discussing the U.S. transfer pricing rules.From a purely pedagogical perspective, when I read the recent case of Altera Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am by Eric Goldman
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:16 am by Steve Harms
See Power Press Sales Co v MSI Battle Creek Stamping, 238 Mich App 173, 183, 604 NW2d 772 (1999). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:16 am by Steve Harms
See Power Press Sales Co v MSI Battle Creek Stamping, 238 Mich App 173, 183, 604 NW2d 772 (1999). [read post]