Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Rhodes" Results 41 - 60 of 561
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by David Super
  In only one state – Rhode Island – would the voters have anything to say about it. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 11:02 am by Florian Mueller
Google case over Google's search engine practices is pending in the District of Columbia.United States et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am by Mary B. McCord
That same chapter of the report also notes how Rhodes worked with a January 6 rally organizer, Marsha Lessard, to ship tactical equipment to D.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
By 1790 both North Carolina and Rhode Island had ratified the Constitution and the proposed amendments. [read post]
On Jan. 8, a grand jury charged eleven members of the Oath Keepers paramilitary group, including its founder, Elmer Stewart Rhodes, III, with seditious conspiracy—the first use of that charge in more than a decade. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Any booking website connecting people with hotel rooms, homestays, or any other activity subject to local tourism taxes could fully comply through state-level filings. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Tobacco Tax Differentials Incentivize Smuggling People respond to incentives. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Reviewing the Spitzter Declaration led to finding three laws I had missed: an 1871 D.C. ordinance, an 1893 Rhode Island statute, and another enactment of a Montana anti-dueling statute. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:12 am by jonathanturley
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 5:57 am by jonathanturley
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]