Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Simmons" Results 21 - 40 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2009, 1:28 pm
Although the People demonstrated due diligence in attempting to locate the victim for trial (see People v Arroyo, 54 NY2d 567, 571, cert denied 456 US 979), the court unduly restricted defense counsel's cross-examination of the victim at the preliminary hearing, and thus the admission in evidence of the preliminary hearing testimony deprived defendant of his right of confrontation (see People v Simmons, 36 NY2d 126, 130-131). [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:46 am
Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., No. 05-381, issued 2/20/2007), Justice Scalia (Rockwell Int'l v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
Merpel adds: for people who like statistics, China ranks 51st in the list of 143 countries from which IP enthusiasts visit the IPKat website. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 6:32 pm
SPECIAL MULTI-PERIL POLICY - WATER DAMAGE EXCLUSION - SINKHOLE COLLAPSE - EFFICIENT PROXIMATE CAUSE Simmons v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
 The People have the initial burden of going forward to show the “lack of any undue suggestiveness” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335 [1990]; People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533 [1997]). [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:44 am by Perry J. Browder
The post Cancer-Causing Asbestos Could Be Gone for Good if EPA Makes the Right Decision appeared first on Simmons Hanly Conroy. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, a defendant may be guilty of the crime by performing "a series of acts, none of which may be enough by itself to constitute the offense but each of which when combined make out the crime" (id.; see also Simmons, 92 NY2d at 831; Cowley v People, 83 NY 464, 472 [1881]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Indeed, a defendant may be guilty of the crime by performing "a series of acts, none of which may be enough by itself to constitute the offense but each of which when combined make out the crime" (id.; see also Simmons, 92 NY2d at 831; Cowley v People, 83 NY 464, 472 [1881]). [read post]