Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Simmons" Results 101 - 120 of 320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Some people think that the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) is not working properly. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
” And Simmons v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:51 am by Florian Mueller
" (emphasis added) The Federal Circuit said so in its mid-2013 Fresenius decision and based this holding on "[t]he Supreme Court's decision in Simmons Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
Shoenfeld, Mark (1997), “Waging battle: Ashford v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, a defendant may be guilty of the crime by performing "a series of acts, none of which may be enough by itself to constitute the offense but each of which when combined make out the crime" (id.; see also Simmons, 92 NY2d at 831; Cowley v People, 83 NY 464, 472 [1881]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Indeed, a defendant may be guilty of the crime by performing "a series of acts, none of which may be enough by itself to constitute the offense but each of which when combined make out the crime" (id.; see also Simmons, 92 NY2d at 831; Cowley v People, 83 NY 464, 472 [1881]). [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, a defendant may be guilty of the crime by performing “a series of acts, none of which may be enough by itself to constitute the offense but each of which when combined make out the crime” (id.; see also Simmons, 92 NY2d at 831; Cowley v People, 83 NY 464, 472 [1881]). [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Actual harm to the child need not result for criminal liability; it is "sufficient that the defendant act in a manner which is likely to result in harm to the child, knowing of the likelihood of such harm coming to the child" (People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [emphasis added]). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Actual harm to the child need not result for criminal liability; it is "sufficient that the defendant act in a manner which is likely to result in harm to the child, knowing of the likelihood of such harm coming to the child" (People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [emphasis added]). [read post]