Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Simmons"
Results 141 - 160
of 320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
The first, Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
If there is `a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification,' Simmons v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
”Over to guest Kat, Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons) who reports on the session:"The SPC panel was moderated by Oliver Jan Jüngst (Bird & Bird LLP, Düsseldorf) and first to take the stage was Marleen van den Horst (BarentsKrans, The Hague) who presented on SPC Reform in the EU. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:26 am
However, the people seem to be okay with 2 of the Court's 3 categorical exclusions:Mentally retarded (Atkins): 18.7 / 79.6 / 1.7Under 18 (Simmons): 41.6 / 56.6 / 1.6Rape of a child (Kennedy): 67.3 / 31.5 / 1.2Boumediene v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 7:19 am
Last Thursday (September 6th), the First Department rejected such a Multiple Chemical Sensitivity lawsuit in Spierer v Bloomingdale's, 2007 NY Slip Op 06575. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 6:48 am
Simmons (juvenile death penalty) discussing what science says about adolescent brains. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:27 am
Simmons, the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:16 am
Likewise, in Jennings v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 11:57 am
District Court judge authorizing the use of a geofence warrant in the Jan. 6 prosecution case United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 11:35 am
Simmons, not his pal Marek. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am
Simmons). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
Kent v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:06 pm
Francis v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:08 pm
Graham v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 9:03 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:08 pm
Graham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
One example is Schriro v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
" Actual harm to the child need not result for criminal liability; it is "sufficient that the defendant act in a manner which is likely to result in harm to the child, knowing of the likelihood of such harm coming to the child" (People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [emphasis added]). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:20 am
Simmons, 179 F. [read post]
