Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Stacey"
Results 61 - 80
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Lemley: his instinct is for standards so that they adapt, but he gets that people have different preferences. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
” Fairfax County Sheriff Stacey Kincaid now seeks to revisit that conclusion. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
For more on this in the trademark context, see Stacey Dogan’s new article, “We Know It When We See It. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:40 pm
And then in 1992, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
In Snyder v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:09 pm
People used to play video games using fake teams and fake players. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
’”Lady Justice Stacey Abrams got Georgians to vote. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
Stacey Plaskett (D-V.I.). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
Trademark David Bernstein The Tiffany v. eBay case’s result is inconsistent with Inwood, tort principles and Inwood's progeny, but David thinks it reached the right result. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
What if Congressman Adam Schiff, or gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, or actor George Clooney is suddenly declared to be subject to being stripped of their assets, because they have made the wrong people angry? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:17 pm
Two years later, in Skinner v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Keeble v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
Mark Lemley and Stacey Dogan, among others, have argued that this shouldn’t be understood as trademark use, but at the very least it has both commercial and message-delivering aspects. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Stacey Dogan & Jessica Silbey: Jack Daniels & the False Promise of Trademark Use. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
But a-lurching we must go.It is with that in mind that I read through President trump's State of the Union Address, and the response by Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
Erin Molan and Nyadol Nyuon have said it would be “almost impossible” to uptake and not “useful” to most people in Australia due to the cost and effort involved, the Guardian reports. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Sarah Burstein: Reichman is worried that designs can’t satisfy nonobviousness—but the Federal Circuit has removed constraints.Reichman: the Fed Cir has improved it; but still, nonobviousness means that people don’t apply—the lawyers tell the designer there’s no chance. [read post]
