Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Stevens"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 5:39 am
From Doe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
An approach more aware of regular people’s concerns must therefore come from the agencies and their work in the courts. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
From L.W. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:28 am
The 1959 wrongful conviction of teenager Steven Truscott was a significant factor in creating public opinion nationally to oppose to use of the death penalty and toward the outright abolition. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens's Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
Hon. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:28 pm
Steven G. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
” Id., at 133 (Souter, J., joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., dissenting). [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The post Justice Stevens's Papers Reveal How The Fortune Cookies Were Baked In <I>Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:10 am
In this instance, 16 young people from across Montana, who were between 2 and 18 years old when the case was filed in 2020, brought their constitutional climate lawsuit, Held v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:54 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
The impact of climate change on the cultural identity of Indigenous Peoples and the nation’s first “climate refugees”. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am
It animated his final Religion Clauses opinion, a 2022 dissent in Carson v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
If the prediction turns out to be true that June 1 is the drop-dead date, then June 2 would simply be the first day on which people could file suit to stop the President from doing what had previously been merely hypothetical. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
