Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Woods" Results 381 - 400 of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2016, 7:46 am by Alex R. McQuade
Before Apple responded in court, Andrew Woods commented on Apple’s possible arguments. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:52 am by Lyle Denniston
Judge Wood also relied in part upon a wide interpretation of the Supreme Court’s 1967 ruling in Loving v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
In the "Caroline case" (von Hannover v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
  They are the co-authors of Secular Government, Religious People (forthcoming, Eerdmans Publishing Co., July 2014). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
Zimmer and Halo Electronics v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:17 pm
People do such silly things. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
” He alleges it did nothing of the sort, and also contained an ingredient, yohimbe, that is dangerous for some people. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am by Marty Lederman
”  Many people receive such services through Medicare, or Medicaid, or by purchasing a plan (often with substantial government subsidies) on a government-run “exchange. [read post]