Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Woods" Results 781 - 800 of 1,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Conor McEvily
  Simply put, California needs to lock up fewer people, as does our nation. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:29 pm by Paul A. Prados
  Most importantly, for purposes of my coverage, it was filed in my neck of the woods where I can get access to the files as the case progresses. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm by Mark Litwak
Most people would find it offensive to discover a voyeur peering through their bedroom window. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
In the first, NEJ v Wood, the claimant was an actor who restrained the disclosure of his name by a prostitute – a woman who achieved tabloid fame as a result of an encounter with footballer Wayne Rooney and who according to the energetic Mr Max Clifford is proposing to “tell all” in an “explosive autobiography” published abroad. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am by INFORRM
  The first, NEJ v Helen Wood, was as the Press Gazette reports, granted on  9 April 2011 by Mr Justice Blake with the defendant then anonymised as “BDZ”. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm
There are parallels between aspects of it and Joseph Conrad's novella Heart of Darkness: cruelty, the abandonment of civilized norms, and apparent madness; remote locations that discouraged outside investigation; and arranged displays of severed heads.In 2008, responding to a neighbor's complaint, Santa Cruz County Animal Services Authority employees and sheriff's deputies visited defendant's property, located deep in the woods in a remote part of Santa Cruz County. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 8:17 pm by Toni Guarino
Judge Wood held that the labels were only entitled to one statutory damage award per each work infringed, regardless of how many people downloaded the recording. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
The date of the certification of the candidate for appointment rather than the date a candidate's name is reachable for appointment controls Matter of Woods v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by Mark Fenster
I thoroughly appreciate the difficult position that Professor Cronon finds himself in, especially as I am a public official in the state of Florida, which has arguably the most exacting sunshine laws in the country (enshrined in our state constitution no less) and where one of the key state supreme court decisions enforcing the open meeting act concerned a dean search at my law school (Wood v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
The court distinguished Kearns on the basis that the defendant in that case, the Bar Council, was not a “public authority”; but it showed a clear preference for the (conflicting) approach in Wood v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [2005] EMLR 20. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm by David Lat
Yours truly and Chief Judge KozinskiUnited States v. [read post]