Search for: "The People v. English" Results 101 - 120 of 3,256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2022, 9:07 am
Maybe the author wrote the line that way to sound archaic to the people of 1966.That's her tomb, you may realize. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:45 pm by Amy Howe
  Let’s talk about today’s decision in Plain English. [read post]
Previously the test for “dishonesty” laid down in R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053 required the prosecution to prove (1) that the actions of the defendant were dishonest by the lay objective standards of ordinary, reasonable and honest people and (2) that the defendant must have realised that ordinary honest people would regard his behaviour as having fallen below those standards. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
These were in response to Stonewall adverts, also on London buses, which promoted gay marriage rights with the slogan ”Some people are gay. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am by Lisa McElroy
Let’s start with the oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:30 am
 The D.A. has a transcription of the interrogation which has been translated into English. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:16 pm
Even though Ibarra speaks Spanish, he repeated his request in English. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
Beyond Retro usethe "V" word too ...The Opposition Division generously upheld the opposition for goods in Classes 18 and 25, but rejected it for the goods in Class 14. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
If D1 and D2 voluntarily engage in fighting each other, each intending to kill or cause grievous bodily harm to the other and each foreseeing that the other has the reciprocal intention, and D1 mistakenly kills V in the course of the fight, in what circumstances, if any, is D2 guilty of the offence of murdering V? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
But yesterday’s oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]