Search for: "The People v. Furman" Results 61 - 80 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by SHG
When the Supreme Court held that the death penalty was unconstitutionally arbitrary in Furman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:39 pm by Harold O'Grady
A decade later, the Court struck them all down in Furman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:00 am by Brian Stull, Capital Punishment Project
" Justice Stevens wrote the court's opinion barring the death penalty for mentally retarded people as cruel and unusual punishment (link to Atkins v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 7:40 am by Nathan Koppel
” In response to a question about what she would like to accomplish in her remaining years on the court, the justice said she would like to revive the Supreme Court’s ruling in Furman v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:57 am by Ryan McKeen
If Ruth Bader Ginsburg has her way (and she likely won’t), it shall all be for naught: In response to a question about what she would like to accomplish in her remaining years on the court, the justice said she would like to revive the Supreme Court’s ruling in Furman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:27 pm by Adam Gillette
  Governor Malloy's statement points out that in the twelve years prior to Furman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:34 pm by Administrator
The death penalty was suspended in the United States from 1972 through 1976 primarily as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Furman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm by Ron Coleman
Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that Judge Furman misapplied the law. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
  In Puerto Rico v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
  In some German towns and executioner was permitted three strikes (really) before being being grabbed by the crowd and forced to die in place of the poor sinner.In his concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:29 am by Ashby Jones
Supreme Court placed a moratorium on executions in its 1972 Furman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm by Brian Stull
The decisions granting relief are to be celebrated, but they address only the symptoms, not the underlying problem, recognized more than 40 years ago in Furman v. [read post]