Search for: "The People v. Furman" Results 61 - 80 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 2:31 pm by Lovechilde
  Because it is “so wantonly and so freakishly” used, California’s death penalty has become a wholly arbitrary punishment in the same sense as the death penalty laws that were struck down by the Supreme Court in 1972 in Furman v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm by Jeff Gamso
   For that killing, Warren McCleskey ended up on death row.In 1972, the Supremes decided Furman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:03 am by Jeff Gamso
At one time.In 1972, in separate opinions in Furman v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:21 am by Kent Scheidegger
  At the time, it was a fair interpretation of Furman that such broad consideration of circumstances was unconstitutional, and in a companion case to Jurek, Gregg v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:52 am by Melissa L. Greipp
Another of my favorites is the primary defense brief in the set of consolidated cases that came to be known as Furman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am by Natalie Nicol
Judge Furman began his analysis with a discussion of Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am by Natalie Nicol
Judge Furman began his analysis with a discussion of Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am by Natalie Nicol
Judge Furman began his analysis with a discussion of Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am by Natalie Nicol
Judge Furman began his analysis with a discussion of Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
Powell, who voted in favor of upholding the death penalty in and Furman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:30 pm by Jeff Gamso
  (The same, but even more clearly, when they decided Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 12:57 pm by Adam Gillette
People with a keen grasp of legal history may recall that from the time that the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:32 pm by Antonio Jimenez
Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Furman v. [read post]