Search for: "The People v. Furman"
Results 121 - 140
of 158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2010, 9:47 am
The Pulitzer prize-winning UT scholar's latest book is Capital Punishment on Trial: Furman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:34 pm
The death penalty was suspended in the United States from 1972 through 1976 primarily as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Furman v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:27 am
Supreme Court placed a moratorium on executions in its 1972 Furman v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:29 am
Supreme Court placed a moratorium on executions in its 1972 Furman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:40 am
Kentucky (S-1), Melvin Rees v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
Supreme Court rulings on flawed jury instructions used prior to 1991.The 5-4 decision did not affect Hood's 1990 conviction in the shooting death of two people in Plano. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
Furman v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
Furman v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm
In 1972, the United States Supreme Court halted all executions in this country with the case of Furman v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:01 am
In 1972, the United States Supreme Court halted all executions in this country with the case of Furman v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:51 pm
” Neither the statute nor the Supreme Court have defined the term or who may invoke it, but in NBC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
Ohio, Furman v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:35 am
Georgia that some death penalty laws enacted in the wake of Furman v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:34 am
Less than a year later, the California Supreme Court struck down the state's death penalty in People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
See Furman vs. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:40 pm
The Supreme Court in 1972 ruled in Furman v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:21 pm
" Furman v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, until rendered moot by the California Supreme Court decision in People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Furman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:48 pm
The Court appears to be taking seriously the mandate it has set out at least since Furman v. [read post]
