Search for: "The People v. Harding" Results 1 - 20 of 9,880
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Rosenstengel, who was willing to do the hard work required under Rule 702, specially as it has been recently amended for clarification and emphasis of the gatekeeper’s responsibilities to evaluate validity issues in the proffered opinions of expert witnesses. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
Indeed, he made the “mistake” of including people in senior administration positions who remained loyal to the Constitution. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
So now there is a second crime that is hard for most of us to see, at least outside of New York. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am by Larry
But the hard question was not what constitutes a “calendar. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Amy Howe
” Much of Monday’s argument focused on the Supreme Court’s 1962 ruling in Robinson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-China Economic and Security Review Commission was created by the United States Congress in October 2000 with the legislative mandate to monitor, investigate, and submit to Congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm by Gary J. Simson
The Code gives the other Justices no authority to order him not to sit, but that doesn’t mean they are powerless to try to stop him from wreaking havoc on the reputation of the Court.Because of people’s already much-depleted confidence in the Court, and because of all that’s at stake for the nation in Trump v. [read post]