Search for: "The People v. Reynolds" Results 201 - 220 of 512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
To understand why the federal guidelines for drug offenses need to be revised, read Judge Gleeson’s full opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:06 am
Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice Court Revisits Concurrent Court's Decision On Period of Post-Release Supervision People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The House of Lords loses the plot The first seismic change in the law of defamation as it applies to the media occurred in 1999 in the case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
There was, for example, no provision for Thames Water to exercise any control over Southwark (compare Bowstead & Reynolds, at paragraph 1-017) or for Southwark to exercise diligence, care or skill (compare Bowstead & Reynolds, at paragraphs 1-016 and 6-017); v) The 2000 Agreement also omitted any reference to Thames Water giving Southwark authority to collect money from the tenants. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
 People cover up for others for many reasons, not all of them bad. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  In TM: Reynolds Wrap v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
  "The surrounding circumstances must support the inference of a 'conscious and substantial possession by the accused, as distinguished from a mere involuntary or superficial possession.' "  Jackson, 995 So. 2d at 539 (quoting Reynolds v. [read post]