Search for: "The People v. Rogers" Results 101 - 120 of 1,294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 8:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 As for trademark, I'm hard pressed to see likely confusion, but given how expansive the doctrine has become, you might not even need dilution, unless a court sees this as a Rogers v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Rogers (2011) – Kelly TerryPublic Housing as Housing of Last Resort: Department of Housing and Urban Development v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
The contributions to this on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and Arizona v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The evening will feature storyteller Roger Fernandes, a member of the Lower Elwha Klallam Nation, and a performance by the internationally renowned Git-hoan (People of the Salmon) Native Dance Group. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.html Petition for certiorari was filed in one case on 5/14/20:Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:18 am by Walter Olson
” [Ken, Popehat] “Why Mitt Romney likes firing people” [Suzanne Lucas] Free speech and union dues: Tim Sandefur on the oral argument in Knox v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm by Lauren Kuley
Good Faith and Probable Cause: In another en banc decision, Judge John Rogers and eleven others held in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm by David Bernstein
Roger Vinson, meet Roger Taney.Really? [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by zshapiro
For on that day Moore, together with two friends, attacked Kenneth Rogers. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Principles by Roger PilonIntroduction By Ilya Shapiro ANNUAL KENNETH B. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
In Aviva Insurance Limited v Roger George Brown [2011] EWHC 362 QB, Mr Justice Eder was asked to consider a claim by Aviva for the recovery of sums it had paid to an insured under a home insurance policy (the Policy) on the basis that the paid claims were fraudulent.The factsThe Defendant, Mr Brown, made claims under the Policy for subsidence of his property in 1989 and 1996. [read post]