Search for: "The People v. Thomas" Results 81 - 100 of 5,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
  He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:39 pm
Legal scholars and historians unanimously report that free people of color did not serve as jurors, in either the North or South, until 1860. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:39 pm by Christine Corcos
Legal scholars and historians unanimously report that free people of color did not serve as jurors, in either the North or South, until 1860. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
 As Thomas Merrill has noted, “[a]dministrative rulemaking, at least in its modern guise, is subject to a much more unyielding set of procedural requirements” than legislative statute-making. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
People talk of Chevron deference as though it were binary (deference or no deference), but in practice it is not so monolithic. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Thomas McCarthy Trustee Chair in Law and Political Science at USC Gould School of Law. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
The ICO has fined two home improvement companies for marketing phone calls to people on the UK’s “do not call” register. [read post]