Search for: "The People v. Watkins" Results 81 - 100 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2015, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
That was the question before the Justices as the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Jack Sharman
  Counsel should therefore remember that he or she is dealing with individual people rather than the institution of “Congress. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The case which has most recently looked at section 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (RPA) is Watkins v Woolas ([2010] EWHC 2702(QB)). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
To be sure, justices are people, and people have biases, usually in favor of their own groups. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am by Graham Smith
” (emphasis added)We do not know what proportion of initial leads are false positives, casting suspicion on blameless people. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Aidan O'Neill QC
   Despite some initial scepticism about the need or utility for reliance upon notions of common law constitutionalism in a post HRA/post EU Charter era (see for example Watkins v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:30 am
Watkins (1961), which struck down a state law that barred those who do not believe in God from being notaries, and Welsh v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]