Search for: "The People v. Watkins"
Results 121 - 140
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2011, 8:19 pm
” See: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Mitchell Cowan with Watkins Ludlam in Jackson represents Nissan. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:18 am
Lowe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
In People ex rel. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 am
Updated | SG v St Gregory’s Catholic Science College [2011] EWHC 1452 (Admin) (17 June 2010) – Read judgment Most people have their first taste of injustice at school. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
The Michigan Supreme Court ordered that the application for leave to appeal in People v Yeakey, No. 142658, be held in abeyance pending the Michigan Supreme Court’s decisions in People v Pullen (No. 142751) and People v Watkins (No. 142031), which may resolve an issue raised in the application. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Grow - http://tinyurl.com/3dk9rmo (Cas Purdy) Deloitte Global Corporate Counsel Report 2011 - http://tinyurl.com/3gbdrc4 (Registration Required) (Deloitte) eDiscovery Basics: Litigation Preparedness (Vol. 1, No. 3) http://tinyurl.com/4xfffbz (Gibson Dunn) June Edition of Corporate Counsel Magazine - Online - http://tinyurl.com/3efpac7 (ALM) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 1 - http://tinyurl.com/3ojftdf (Kayleigh Roberts, Ashley Trent) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 2 -… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:27 am
Watkins, Case No. 142031 and People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:17 am
And in People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
The Court granted leave in People v Pullen and People v Watkins, denied eleven applications, held two cases in abeyance pending the outcomes of People v Pullen and People v Watkins, and in lieu of granting leave to appeal, the Court reversed the Court of Appeals in two cases and remanded one case to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:46 am
Supreme Court case about her grandfather: Watkins v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
A thousand thanks to the IPKat's friends at the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP for hosting this year's IP Publishers and Editors Lunch on behalf of this weblog. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
Watkins v Woolas [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB); [2010] WLR (D) 288 “S 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, which imposed the penalties for an election candidate found guilty of a corrupt or illegal practice, was compatible with the right to freedom of expression contained in art 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm
Robert Elwyn Watkins v Philip James Woolas [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB) 5 November 2010- read judgment The Election Court has ruled that the Labour MP for Oldham knowingly and deliberately misled the constituency and as a result his election is void under Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act (1983). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
Here is the judgment of the two High Court judges in the Watkins v Woolas case. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
(Court v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
” Wrighten v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:54 am
Gray County is economically devastated and the political viewpoints there would make people in the Tea Party blush. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 4:34 pm
People v Watkins, 10 AD3d 665, 665-666, lv denied 3 NY3d 761). [read post]
