Search for: "The People v. Watson" Results 101 - 120 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2023, 8:48 am by Eva Lopez
” Sommer Foster and Shanay Watson-Whittaker Michigan Voices “We had an inkling that Roe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 1:39 pm
Warren Watson outcries the implications of Morse v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
For people who have been watching the recent North Carolina election cases like Harris v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
  The point was discussed by the Information Tribunal in the 2007 case of Bluck v Information Commissioner (EA/2006/0090) held that a hospital owed a continuing duty of confidence to the dead woman which was actionable by her next of kin after her death. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:07 am by Steve McConnell
Jennings was the uber-Jeopardy champion, magnificent even when he lost to Watson. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
Hull NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Post-Release Supervision Terminated; Defendant Discharged From Sentence People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:32 pm by Apeng
The People) ECJ rules in intermediary liability case L’Oreal v eBay / ????????? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:32 pm by Apeng
The People) ECJ rules in intermediary liability case L’Oreal v eBay / ????????? [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:57 am by Jon Ibanez
However, the landmark case of People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:57 am by Jon Ibanez
However, the landmark case of People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]