Search for: "The People v. Wolff"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2018, 10:44 am
Excelsior College v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:45 pm
(Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:21 am
By way of perspective, several early 1800s American cases (I know of four published opinions, Ruggles, Updegraph, Kneeland, and Murray) upheld convictions for blasphemy of Christianity, sometimes based on similar facts: People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 6:45 am
The case is Bentley-Ammonds v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:30 am
Some people act the same way when they write briefs. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 7:25 am
Tobias Barrington Wolff is Professor of Law at Penn Law. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 7:24 am
S Leiby, The Case for Rage in Transitional Justice: Lessons from the Anti-Racist Struggle Anushka Sehmi, Legacies of Colonial Violence in Contemporary Transitional Justice: Memories of Mau Mau, the ‘Kapenguria Six’ and the ‘Ocampo Six’ in Kenya Pablo Pamplona, Beatriz Besen, Kaya de Wolff, Soraia Ansara, & Luis Galeão-Silva, Racial (In)justice in Brazil: Reconstructing the Subaltern Memories of Poor and Black Women in the Brazilian Dictatorship … [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm
Jackson Women’s Health overruling Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 1:51 pm
Source: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/30/v/70Read More [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:06 am
Wolff opines that the cap on non-economic damages violates the constitutional right to a trial by jury which can only be changed by a vote of the people. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He says that if a Bill of the UK Parliament were to change the Scottish Parliament’s competence like this, then such a Bill would engage the legislative consent convention. 15.28 Wolffe QC states that he does not consider Scottish Parliament to have any veto on the decision to trigger article 50 but that its view is relevant to the question of legislative consent. 15.26 Wolffe QC’s preliminary comments are over and he is now turning to the specific… [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:07 pm
See Klotz v St Anthony's Concurring Opinion of Judge Wolff Starting on Page 29 of the .pdf file. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:32 am
” Wolff v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
Sources: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/767.407 https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/767/v/41/5/amRead More [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
Austria -- I assume from the facts and from the initials that this is the Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff case. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 2:28 pm
” New York Times Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:01 pm
We failed you.Iqbal v. [read post]
