Search for: "The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Petitioner, v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Respondents"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Federal Communications Commission 13-1124Issue: (1) Whether the Court should overrule Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
To the extent that the attorney general's brief addressed the point on changes in health insurance for judges, it did so because the petitioner judges addressed that cause of action against all respondents, including the Legislature and the governor. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of California, et al. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Petitioner's reply Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
CALPERS: SECURITIES ACT STATUTE OF REPOSE NOT SUBJECT TO EQUITABLE TOLLING In California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
” Click Here Unilever Fined for Polluting California Air With Deodorant Spray. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Respondents failed to provide EPA with the required notice, although the State of Rhode Island was notified. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm
Quotations from our interviews and survey responses reflect the views and personal experiences of individuals, not necessarily the experience of most ISOs across the United States. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
