Search for: "The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea" Results 21 - 40 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm by Giles Peaker
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2017] UKSC 36 (For our report of the Court of Appeal decision, see here). [read post]
10 May 2017, 2:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2015] EWCA Civ 711   This appeal considered the scope of enquiries required of a local authority when making decisions in homelessness cases to which the Equality Act 2010, s 149 applies, and the standard of review to be applied by courts when reviewing decisions of the local authority in such cases. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 14 February, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
The correct approach to that duty is set by the Court of Appeal in decisions such as R v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea ex p. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Giles Peaker
Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough Of Ealing [2017] EWHC 24 (Admin) A judicial review in which two local authorities fought over which of them was gong to have to owe a housing duty to a homeless applicant. [read post]
8 May 2016, 2:31 pm by Giles Peaker
So where reports set out social workers’ conclusions on questions of judgement of this kind, they should be construed in a practical way, with the aim of seeking to discover their true meaning (see per Lord Dyson in McDonald v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33 at [53]). [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:37 pm by Giles Peaker
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea [2015] EWCA Civ 711 At issue in this second appeal from a s.204 appeal was whether it was reasonable for Ms Poshteh to have refused an offer of accommodation. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Mohammed v Manek and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (1995) 27 HLR 439, it was held that, as a general rule, accommodation made available for an applicant pending enquiries as to what (if any) duty was owed to him under Pt 7, Housing Act 1996, was not within the scope of s 3, so that an authority do not have to obtain a possession order before evicting an applicant. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am by Giles Peaker
” The Court reminded itself of the high threshold for a mandatory, rather than prohibitory injunction, of a ‘strong prima facie case’, via Francis V Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2003] 1 WLR 2248, then went on to the criteria for the exercise of the discretion to accommodate pending appeal in R v Camden London Borough Council ex parte Mohammed [1997] 30 HLR 315. [read post]