Search for: "The Southwark" Results 241 - 260 of 468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm by NL
He found, therefore, that the employment was not “effective” and, consequently, that Mrs Amin was not a ‘worker’ within the meaning of Article 39 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.Ms Amin appealed.HHJ Rylance, sitting at Wandsworth County Court, held that it was clear from the jurisprudence of the ECHR and the decision of the Court of Appeal in Barry v Southwark LBC [2009] ICR 437 (our report here) that the question of whether work is… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:50 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41 (28 January 2011) Hope and Glory Public House Ltd, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 31 (26 January 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Shah v General Pharmaceutical Council [2011] EWHC 73 (Admin) (28 January 2011) Jones v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 50 (Admin) (27 January 2011) Oadby Hilltop and Meadowcroft Conservation Area Association & Anor, R (on… [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 2:16 am
On 3 November 2008, a confiscation order was made against Lomas for £470,113.On 25 February 2009, Condon was ordered to pay £1.28 million at a confiscation hearing at Southwark Crown Court. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm by Anita Davies
The more substantive changes are these guidance on the length of grounds of appeal (UKSC PD3 para 3.1.2 and JCPC PD 3 para 3.1.2) and on chronologies in statements of facts and issues (UKSC PD 5 para 5.1.3 and JCPC PD 5 para 5.1.7); an express reference to the House of Lords’ Practice Statement of 26 July 1966 on judicial precedent and the passage in Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 making it clear that the statement still applies;… [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:23 pm by Giles Peaker
 Hotak v Southwark LBC [2015] UKSC 30 (our report) was considered, and the High Court found that Wandsworth’s decision that Ms O would not be ‘significantly worse off’ without accommodation than an ordinary person was not made in error. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:09 am by lpcprof
Rolph, But perhaps the most sensational case, occurred in 1852, with newspaper headings entitled, "Superstition in Philadelphia," and "Witchcraft--Evidence of an Enlightened Age," when Mary Ann Clinton & Susan Spearing, residents of Southwark Ward, were formally charged at the 'Court of Quarter Sessions,' with "conspiring to cheat and defraud George F. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:19 am by tracey
Supreme Court McGowan (Procurator Fiscal) v B (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 54 (23 November 2011) Jude v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 55 (23 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Samarenko v Dawn Hill House Ltd [2011] EWCA civ 1445 (01 December 2011) Oso v Newham University Hospital NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 1423 (01 December 2011) Francis v London Borough of Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 1418 (01 December 2011) Proactive Sports Management Ltd v Rooney &… [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm by NL
He found, therefore, that the employment was not “effective” and, consequently, that Mrs Amin was not a ‘worker’ within the meaning of Article 39 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.Ms Amin appealed.HHJ Rylance, sitting at Wandsworth County Court, held that it was clear from the jurisprudence of the ECHR and the decision of the Court of Appeal in Barry v Southwark LBC [2009] ICR 437 (our report here) that the question of whether work is… [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 1:13 pm
It is what I do, to paraphrase the Bishop of Southwark. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Monday 15 December 2014 the Court will hear the joined appeals of Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark involving what the correct test should be when trying to establish if a person should have priority need status for the purposes of the Housing Act 1996, s19, in particular how to determine whether they were “vulnerable”. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
This appeared to be confirmed in the case of Pryce v Southwark LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 1572, in which the Court of Appeal held – albeit after Southwark had conceded the appeal – that a Zambrano right of residence conferred a right to welfare benefits and housing.Now unsurprisingly there has been a large amount of fire fighting on behalf of both the Government and the courts. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 8:35 am
Whilst on the Childrens Act 1989,   G, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Southwark [2007] EWCA Civ 1506   - permission given to appeal the Judicial Review on the issue of how far a social services assessment is a finding of fact capable of giving rise to a s.20 duty. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:17 pm by Giles Peaker
Closing date: Tuesday 7th June 2016Interview date: Tuesday 14th June 2016 Citizens Advice – Southwark Council Homeowners Advisor NJC Scale 6 spinal point range 26 to 28 £26,236 (actual starting salary) to £27,771 per annum – plus 5% pension supplement Full-time – 35 hours per week Fixed Term to 31 January 2018 We have been awarded funding by Southwark Council Homeowners Council to recruit an additional post to support the work of our… [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
This appeared to be confirmed in the case of Pryce v Southwark LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 1572, in which the Court of Appeal held – albeit after Southwark had conceded the appeal – that a Zambrano right of residence conferred a right to welfare benefits and housing.Now unsurprisingly there has been a large amount of fire fighting on behalf of both the Government and the courts. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]