Search for: "The State v. Keith Sharpe"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
Miss.) in Favre v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:37 am
This week’s Sixth Circuit ruling in Tucker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
United States NME had a piece “Kesha denied appeal of Dr. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
Petrick, Keith R. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
In Garcetti v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
United States CNN reports that Stormy Daniels has reached a settlement with Michael Cohen and Keith Davidson, her former attorney, in her lawsuit that accused both men of working together to protect President Donald Trump. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
The Handbook’s sharp separation between political science and law in Parts II (Neil Komesar, Neal Devins, Mariah Zeisberg, Justin Crowe, Russell Muirhead and Nancy Rosenblum, Mark Tushnet, Adrian Vermeule, Jenna Bednar, Bartholomew Sparrow, Bill White) and III (Stephen Griffin, Ellen Katz, Keith Whittington, Gillian Metzger, Michael Greve) reflect the dramatic legalization of the Constitution that has taken place over the past two hundred years. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
The Herald has also used the case to analyse the state of Australia as a jurisdiction for defamation litigation. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
We had a post about the judgment from the victorious defendant’s solicitor, Keith Mathiesen. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:50 am
It entails a rather sharp break or rupture in time, the shift to a new regime, in a political sense. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
Rather, Judge Keith likely (1) thought it important to accurately quote the facts, even when the facts include offensive words, and (2) drew a sharp distinction between wrongfully using a word as an insult (or perhaps even as an odd compliment, as Coach Dambrot may have misguidedly intended it), and properly mentioning it as a fact. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:53 am
Dambrot v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 8:37 am
" Dambrot v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
In the Courts The libel trial in the case of Miller v Associated Newspapers was heard on 21 to 25 May 2012 before Sharp J, sitting without a jury. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
The University of Strathclyde has commented on this issues stating that “Digital surveillance holds one in five of writers back”. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of… [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
