Search for: "The Texas Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2020, 3:46 pm
In the meantime, the Federal Power Commission began hearings on the problem and threatened to get involved. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
Criminal law -- Habeas corpus -- Murder -- Death penalty -- Counsel -- Ineffectiveness -- Sentencing phase of capital trial -- Failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence concerning petitioner's mental health at time of crime -- State court's determination that petitioner's trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective in preparing for sentencing phase of trial was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established… [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
(By Supreme Court rule, any party other than the petitioner is deemed a respondent before the Court, so IMLA et al. are technically respondents supporting petitioners.) [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:40 pm
See, e.g., Allied Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Dean Foods Company v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and involves the right to challenge the conciliation proceedings of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in employment discrimination matters. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Coverage of the opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of Texas Civil Rights Project (in support of petitioners) Docket: 08-1123 Title: ChevronTexaco Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Shamokin Filler Company, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for the International Trade Commission Brief in opposition for US Phillips Coroporation Petitioners' reply Title: Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Texas has an Access to Justice Commission; but don’t be fooled. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Boards and commissions continue to be allowed to exhibit strong, quasi-judicial powers, in spite of their administrative agency character. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:04 pm
Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
In many Spanish-speaking nations, “notarios” are powerful attorneys with special legal credentials. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Nelson is binding precedent as to petitioners’ constitutional claims. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Federal Communications Commission, 17-498 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
http://j.st/GZS Texas Pipeline Assoc. v. [read post]
