Search for: "The United States Court of Federal Claims"
Results 41 - 60
of 37,508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Federal Torts Claim Act Dismissal Stating that Equitable Tolling Applied
26 May 2015, 5:32 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:55 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia denied efforts of OAN to dismiss the defamation claims of Smartmatic and the remove the case to a California federal court In November 2021, Smartmatic filed this lawsuit, claiming that... [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:27 pm
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
An patient injured by an employee of the United States can usually bring a claim against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:15 am
The United Stated Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held that a district court erred in its claim construction and vacated the district court’s judgment of noninfringement, which the parties stipulated to based on the erroneous construction. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:36 pm
. - The United States Supreme Court has unanimously reversed a patent decision by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and has held that patent claims that are a "law of nature" are not patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:40 am
On August 27, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) reversed and remanded a decision of the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:18 pm
Among those nominated today for positions on the federal judiciary were Acting FTC Chair Maureen Ohlhausen, who was nominated to become a judge on the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 8:34 am
Last week, the United States Supreme Court stirred up employment law by allowing a retaliation claim in two federal employment law cases where the statutes did not specifically create any such lawsuit.Jackson Lewis provides a short but succinct review of the case in Supreme Court Gives Green Light for Retaliation Claims Under Two Civil Rights Statutes:"The ruling is significant because §1981 has a longer statute of… [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:12 pm
The Court explained further that in retaliation claims the federal government is not a party nor are such claims brought in the name of the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:57 am
However, if the federal court chooses not to hear your state law claims, then you have the right to re-file your state law claims in state court. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 8:48 pm
United States, No. 06-1164, in which it held that the special statute of limitations governing the Court of Federal Claims requires that court to consider on its own initiative the timeliness of a suit filed in the claims court, even where the federal government has waived the issue.You can read the Syllabus and Opinions in this case by visiting [www.law.cornell.edu]. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am
But the claim in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 10:50 am
Good news for potential protesters at the Court of Federal Claims (CFC). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:58 am
For example, patent owners can only sue the government for infringement in the United States Court of Federal Claims, as opposed to a district court, and jury trials are not available in the Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:58 am
For example, patent owners can only sue the government for infringement in the United States Court of Federal Claims, as opposed to a district court, and jury trials are not available in the Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:39 am
The United States, in which the Court of Federal Claims ruled that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) could include contract clauses that deviated from federal government commercial contracting rules. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:43 pm
Cautioning that permission was not license, the court allowed the United States’ claims to move along on the Rio Grande. [read post]
