Search for: "Thomas Land Clearing " Results 41 - 60 of 869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 10:16 am by William Hibbitts | JURIST Staff
The Chief Justice stated: A straightforward reading of the statute’s text makes clear that all gaming activities prohibited in Texas are also barred on the Tribe’s land. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Of course, to be clear, the precise legal question has never been decided. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:41 pm by Ilya Somin
Under this clear statement rule, the analysis of §2409a(g) is straightforward. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 6:00 am
  This notable reality is magnified by the fact that Chief Justice Roberts is the sixth Justice to buy his ticket to Apprendi-land. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 6:35 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
On the first issue, the court had no doubt: “First, it is clear that Grey Owl provided “services. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:55 am by Howard Friedman
"Justice Scalia wrote an opinion joined by Justice Thomas, concurring in the judgment but arguing that plaintiff lacks Article III standing to pursue what Scalia characterized as new relief, not an appliation of the original injunction. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
At that trial, the court found that Thomas had waived William's clear conflict of interests, but William acted in bad faith and abused his discretion. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
Specifically, Serwer takes issue with Thomas's claim that the term "freedmen" was racially neutral. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:30 am by Steve Vladeck
Evan Thomas, First: Sandra Day O’Connor (2019). [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:52 am by WynnAndWynn
By: Peter Thomas| Law Clerk Ever thought about learning to rock climb or, even, skydive? [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 9:28 pm by Mark Walsh
Virginia Thomas, the wife of Justice Thomas, takes a seat near the front as well. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:31 am by Richard A. Epstein
But some small fraction of the time his jobs were land based. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:17 am
” (It’s not clear to me whether the facts as Thomas reports them indeed suffices to show a substantial burden, though I agree that if Thomas himself feels a religious obligation to have sex with his wives, then forbidding him from fulfilling this obligation would indeed count as a substantial burden.) [read post]