Search for: "Thomas W Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
As Thomas Piketty has shown, returns to capital and to labor have been heavily skewed toward capital in recent decades due largely to legal and economic frameworks.[23] With respect to politics, one often hears that business should remain “neutral. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am by fjhinojosa
Johnson, Good Intentions: Administrative Fiat and the General Welfare Exclusion, 100 Wash. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another, heard 4 December 2023 (Johnson J) Wilson v Mendelsohn [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:29 am by Abbe R. Gluck
Thomas warned that “[w]e should not sacrifice constitutional protections for the sake of convenience. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Alexander Gelfond
The FTC’s legal authority to promulgate such a rule was previously discussed in these pages (Samuel Estreicher & Zachary Garrett, FTC Authority to Ban Non-compete Clauses in Employment Agreements, Justia Verdict, March 27, 2023), and there remain questions over the FTC’s authority to use rulemaking in competition matters (Thomas W. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
NBCUniversal was denied as anticipated, which drew a separate opinion from Justice Clarence Thomas noting that he would be inclined to reconsider New York Times v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Jackson endeared himself to FDR by aggressively prosecuting—some would say abusively—Andrew W. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:37 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court Chief Justice in September 2005 during President George W. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Romanick, written by Chief Justice Jon Jensen, joined by Justices Daniel Crothers and Lisa Fair McEvers, and by District Judge Daniel Narum, sitting by designation (in place of Justice Douglas Bahr, who was recused): [W]e conclude RRWC has a substantial likelihood in establishing there is a fundamental right for a woman to obtain an abortion in instances where it is necessary to preserve her life or health. [read post]