Search for: "Thomas v. National State Bank"
Results 1 - 20
of 595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2007, 3:56 pm
Answer: Yes, According to the United States Supreme Court in Watters, Commissioner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
Bank of America revealed a bench of justices struggling to reconcile provisions of the National Bank Act that protect national banks with a New York statute requiring all banks (including national banks) to pay interest on the escrow accounts they hold for their mortgage customers. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 6:54 am
The case is Thomas v.... [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:41 am
Watters, in which the Supreme Court held that a state could not exercise visitorial powers over an operating subsidiary of a national bank, many thought that the Supreme Court would extend the OCC's power to near complete preemption of any state authority over national banks. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:58 pm
Bank National Association ND v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Even assuming that national banks would scale back their lending as a result of Madden v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Even assuming that national banks would scale back their lending as a result of Madden v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
However, suppose Thomas Jefferson had been a foreign national that came to the U.S. from the United Kingdom a few years ago as a nonimmigrant in H-1B status to work as a banking and finance lawyer for a Virginia law firm. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:40 am
The 5-3 decision (Thomas did not participate) affirmed the Sixth Circuit's decision that a mortgage lending subsidiary of Wachovia Bank is subject to regulation by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency under the National Banking Act and is not required to comply with the licensing and reporting regime of the state of Michigan in which it operated. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Roberts and Thomas also joined Kennedy in a plurality opinion basing the decision on the application of the two-part test established in Sosa v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
National Australia Bank (08-1191), Renico v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:34 am
National Australia Bank, the U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that federal law, not state law, controls the regulation of mortgage lending activity by national banks, even when that is carried on by an operating subsidiary of the bank. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:01 am
National Australia Bank; and in Doe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm
The only alleged connections to the United States are the CHIPS transactions in Arab Bank’s New York branch and a brief allegation regarding a charity in Texas.Justices Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch each filed a concurring opinion. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Angel Rzeslawsk,The National Bank Act and the Demise of State Consumer Laws, 68 Hastings L.J. 1421 (2017).CASE CITE: Madden v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 10:40 am
The complaint states: “At most, ordinary application of state law to non-banks could reduce the price that non-bank purchasers might be willing to pay national banks for their loans. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
