Search for: "Thomas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services" Results 21 - 40 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2016, 7:45 am by Laura Donohue
 It empowers consumers to transfer their digital data to different service providers. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm by Josh Blackman
  In the Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs sued five defendants: (1) The United States of America, (2) the Department of Health and Human Services, (3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services, (4) the Internal Revenue Service, and (5) the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am by Beck/Herrmann
For this stent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services decided that the "primary mode of action" of this combination product was to fulfill a "device function. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am by Mark Walsh
“The Secretary of Health and Human Services is not a State; so an Exchange established by the Secretary is not an Exchange established by the State; so people who buy insurance through such an Exchange get no money. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:28 am by Joy Waltemath
Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury, along with their respective Secretaries (Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:09 am by David Dirr
  From a policy standpoint, providers argue that the Secretary of Health and Human Services will never have the resources to police all fifty states for compliance with the Medicaid statutes absent provider lawsuits. [read post]
” In the Washington state ruling, District Judge Thomas Rice preliminarily enjoined the defendants—the FDA, commissioner of FDA, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and HHS secretary—”from altering the status or rights of the parties under the operative Mifepristone [Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS)] Program until a determination on the merits. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:45 am by Russell Jackson
  It directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to promote "the development of childhood vaccines that result in fewer and less serious adverse reactions. . . . [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Robbins responded that private litigation is antithetical to the substantial enforcement power and discretion FNHRA accords states and the secretary of health and human services. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am by Jon Gelman
If a State chooses not to follow the directive in Section 18031 to establish an Exchange, the Act tells the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish “such Exchange. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
  The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
PuchalaRichard HubermanDepartment of Health and Human Services Team Leads Tom PerezAnthony BrownWilliam Scott GouldPamela GilbertBill CorrNicole LurieRoberta AchtenbergXavier de Souza BriggsBruce KatzDr. [read post]
21 May 2013, 10:16 am by Ronald Mann
  A claimant who suffers a covered injury seeks relief by filing a petition with the Secretary of Health and Human Services (currently the petitioner, Kathleen Sebelius). [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
The story concerned an October 2019 report by the Department of Health and Human Services that laid out an influenza pandemic scenario much like the one that is now upon us. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
 (Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, whose agency is at the heart of carrying out the law, sat through all three days of arguments in 2012, but she isn’t here today.) [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
” See Thomas Jefferson Univ., 512 U.S. at 512 (deferring to “an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations”). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
” See Thomas Jefferson Univ., 512 U.S. at 512 (deferring to “an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations”). [read post]