Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration" Results 161 - 180 of 383
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Julie Gerberding, the co-chair of the commission on strengthening America’s health security at CSIS; Thomas Inglesby, director of the Center for Health Security at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; and Tara O'Toole, the executive vice president of In-Q-Tel, a non-profit venture capital firm. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Thomas does not believe that politics in any sense of that term — electoral politics, social movements, state action and regulation, organizing, even more radical notions of transformative change — can positively affect black people; he thinks politics mostly hurts black people. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Call for Papers, Institute for Digital Law Trier Thomas Burri (University of St. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That year, the EEOC issued an extensive administrative ruling that reached three conclusions: first, sexual orientation discrimination is a form of gender stereotyping, which the Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am by Hadley Baker, Mikhaila Fogel
Michael Flynn—who would later serve as National Security Advisor in the Trump Administration—recalled that Trump made this request repeatedly…” [Vol. 1, p. 62] IV. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Justice Thomas only this past week, for example, indicated that the Court should not be hesitant to overrule its own precedents should they be manifestly unjust.I realize that I basically agree with the McCloskeyan approach and, therefore, am inclined to agree with much of Lessig’s argument insofar as it is similar. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Though the law has survived innumerable attempts at repeal and administrative sabotage, its intransigent foes, prominently including the Trump administration, are still out to kill it in the courts, and the residual skepticism seeded by the misbegotten-birth narrative could help legitimate their aspiration that, this third, legally absurd, attempt might just succeed. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit and holds that an appeals council’s dismissal of a Social Security claim on timeliness grounds when the claimant has had an administrative law hearing qualifies as a final decision “made after a hearing” so as to allow judicial review under the Social Security Act. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
This convinced Strom Thurmond, the Republican kingmaker in the South, to put his entire weight behind the candidate, helping Nixon secure the nomination at the 1968 GOP convention. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Berryhill, the court held 6-3 that an administrative judge in a social security disability benefits case can rely on testimony by a vocational expert that an applicant can do “other work,” even if the expert does not provide the data she used to form her opinion. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am by SHG
The story is that Associate Justice Harry Blackmun was given authorship of the 7-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Government has finally published its response [pdf] to the 2017 “call for evidence” on the impact of social media on the administration of justice. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm by Daniel Hemel
Along the way, it relies heavily on two of the court’s precedents: the 1946 decision in Social Security Board v. [read post]