Search for: "Thomas v. US Dept of Justice"
Results 1 - 20
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm
Thomas-Rasset, the RIAA and the US Department of Justice have filed briefs opposing defendant's motion to reduce the jury's award of $1,500,000 -- or $62,500 per mp3 single downloaded.RIAA's opposition briefDepartment of Justice's opposition brief[Ed. note. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
The statement was joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia, and Justice Thomas. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
See Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:59 am
Dept. of HHS; and Dept. of HHS v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:59 am
Dept. of HHS; and Dept. of HHS v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:15 am
Schmidt v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:59 pm
L.G. - unanimous opinion authored by Justice Thomas. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm
" Justice Scalia announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, IV, and V, in which Justices Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor joined, and an opinion with respect to Parts II and III, in which Justices Roberts, Thomas, Alito joined. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:56 pm
In People v Buchanan [4th Dept 6/6/08] (here) the Fourth Department unanimously held that the use of a stun belt that is not visible to the jury is subject to the same judicial scrutiny as other forms of physical restraint that are visible. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
The Honorable Thomas T.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:44 am
In Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:41 pm
v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
Four Justices refused to use long introductions at all (Breyer, Scalia, Souter, Thomas) and Justice Alito used them only once (Allison Engine Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
Nelson included a fascinating exchange between Justice Scalia (joined by Justice Thomas) and Justice Alito (writing for the rest of the Court except for Justice Kagan, who was recused). [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:11 pm
Because Justice Sotomayor heard this case while on the Second Circuit even though she did not participate in the decision, she has taken the high road and recused herself from the case (a road that Justice Thomas has refuses to take for challenges to health reform despite a far more egregious conflict-of-interest). [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
Minnesota v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:39 pm
Minnesota v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
” And in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 1:44 pm
Justice Thomas wrote the opinion. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:39 pm
The three other pending cases that the justices may or may not agree to decide in the new term are: Dignity Health v. [read post]
