Search for: "Thomas v. United States Disciplinary Bar" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2008, 1:07 pm
It appears that European courts are less tolerant of bullying record industry lawyers than in the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:03 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
The majority closed by rejecting the unique argument of the United States, which filed a “friend of the court” brief in the case. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:44 am
United States (1972) required prosecutors, under their obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to criminal defendants, to reveal any promises of leniency or other benefits granted to witnesses testifying for the government. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ruehle out of evidence and also referred the law firm to the California state bar for disciplinary action. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
The justices agreed in late October to take up their case along with the Biden administration’s challenge to the law, United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Pennington, a Metropolitan police officer, was off duty when he became involved in an altercation at a Nashville bar. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
  In this schema, lawyers report directly to nonlawyers, and in cases where the client is someone other than the employer, the attorney owes a duty of loyalty to them both. [31]  Many observers state pragmatically that for all intents and purposes, the MDP revolution has already arrived in relation to corporate practice. [32]  Indeed, by the numbers, Arthur Andersen was the biggest employer of lawyers in the United States in 2000. [33] … [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.Docket: 10-1393Issue(s): (1) Whether the political question doctrine deprives the federal courts of jurisdiction to adjudicate a Sherman Act and Clayton Act damage case against both private and state-owned businesses operating in the United States; and (2) whether the act of state doctrine bars antitrust claims against defendants whose conduct was commercial, and where it came to fruition and had its effect in the United… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
McKechnie, United States Air Force Academy Next Week in the Courts We are not aware of any media law cases listed for this week. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:28 am by azatty
Two would remove the State Bar of Arizona from the process. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Thomas, No. 07-1237 Denial of a motion to suppress evidence in a drug and weapons prosecution is affirmed where the defendant was searched pursuant to a lawful arrest for resisting arrest. [read post]