Search for: "Thomas v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm by axd10
Bloomberg (Dec. 6, 2010) American Bar Association (ABA): Supreme Court briefs, Wal-Mart v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:19 am by MBettman
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., suggesting that the misrepresenting or even withholding of evidence might be an actionable wrong, was dicta.) [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Well, it makes more sense than the hairbrush shaped like a grape from Wal-Mart. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
And Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:15 pm by Eugene Lee
Also, as Andrew Cohen of the Atlantic Monthly points out, Concepcion is a foreshadowing of how the Supreme Court will likely rule on Wal-Mart v Dukes, a class action being brought by 1.5 million women against Wal-Mart for discriminatory pay practices. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
District Judge George Caram Steeh denied the Thomas More Law Center's request for an injunction against a provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that imposes a penalty on anyone who fails to buy or otherwise obtain health insurance by 2014.Automotive (Personal Jurisdiction): OVERSEAS GOODYEAR COMPANIES SAY THEY CAN'T BE SUED IN U.S., Goodyear Luxembourg Tires v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Maxwell Kennerly
” It was a phony and vindictive legal fiction designed to dissuade plaintiffs’ lawyers from taking these cases, part of a long campaign against class actions in general that culminated in the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
In sum, these rulings, and a similarly pro-corporate, anti-litigant ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 For a case discussing the distinctions between these two types of warnings in detail, read Thomas v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Patents4Life) CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) Bilski v Doll – Petitioner’s brief, amicus briefs (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (BlawgIT) (PatentBIOtech) (Patently-O) (AwakenIP)   Global Global - General… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:02 am
$45.7M in Attorney Fees Awarded in Wal-Mart Class Action The Legal Intelligencer A Philadelphia judge has ordered Wal-Mart to pay $45.7 million in plaintiffs' attorney fees, $3.6 million in plaintiff expenses and $10 million in prejudgment interest as a result of a class action brought against it by its Pennsylvania employees. [read post]