Search for: "Thompson v. Assurant Employee Benefits et al" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In order to assure that such acquisitions will not deter unsolicited tender offers, the structural argument would require searching judicial review of the board’s motives in any negotiated acquisition. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
View the article hereTimothy Fortney1, Jill Levenson2, Yolanda Brannon3 & Juanita N. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
The $132,000 penalty was ordered after inspectors found problems with the way Spirit transported waste, the way the company stored and disposed of hazardous waste and failing to provide documented hazardous waste training for employees. [read post]