Search for: "Thompson v. Secretary of State" Results 1 - 20 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 2:50 am by sally
R (F (A Child)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Thompson) v Same [2010] UKSC 17; [2010] WLR (D) 98 “The indefinite notification requirements for sexual offenders who had been sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment or more were incompatible with the right to respect for private and family life because they did not contain any mechanism for reviewing the justification for continuing the requirements in individual cases. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:33 am
Regina (F) v Secretary of State for Justice Regina (Thompson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench “In the absence of any mechanism for review, placing an offender on the sex offenders register indefinitely was a disproportionate interference with the right to respect for private and family life. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 9:39 am by Derek Muller
From an opinion by Judge Tjoflat, joined by Judge Moody (sitting by designation) in Thompson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:59 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Thompson, Re Attorney-General’s Reference No 103 of 2011 [2012] EWCA Crim 135 (10 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Costello & Anor v Macdonald & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 86 (10 February 2012) YF (China) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 77 (10 February 2012) Bull & Bull v Hall & Preddy [2012] EWCA Civ 83 (10 February 2012) High Court… [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:02 pm by Josh Blackman
It states that the separation of powers questions decided by the D.C. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:21 am by Aimee Denholm
Helen Mountfield QC, Jessica Simor QC and Rhodri Thompson QC were involved in this case. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 10:17 am by National Indian Law Library
Thompson (prisoners, hair length)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured:Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County, Kansas, v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Traversa v Freddi [2011] EWCA Civ 81 (14 February 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Lightfoot v Go-Ahead Group Plc [2011] EWHC 89 (QB) (01 February 2011) XYZ v Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 243 (QB) (14 February 2011) British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWHC 235 (Admin) (14 February 2011) Poi v “Lina” [2011] EWHC 234 (QB) (14… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:11 pm by Business Law Post
Rev. 1747, 1761 (2004)).18  Nevada Secretary of State, Why Incorporate in Nevada, available at http://nvsos.gov/index.aspx? [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:30 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) McCluskey v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1197 (06 July 2010) Winter & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1474 (06 July 2010) Martin v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1450 (06 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 773 (06 July 2010) ENE 1 Kos Ltd. v Petroleo Brasileiro SA [2010] EWCA Civ 772 (06 July 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench… [read post]