Search for: "Thompson v. Shock"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2007, 7:33 pm
We received this remarkable document in an email from Jack Thompson, Esq., and we reprint it in its entirety:IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDATHE FLORIDA BAR,Complainant,v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:14 pm
In Thompson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:14 pm
In Risko v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 6:14 am
" Friday the Court issued that opinion: U.S. v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:14 pm
Thompson and urged congressional action to hold prosecutors clearly liable for the civil rights violations of their underlings. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am
Thompson was harsh, bordering on punitive, and the court should rethink its holding. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
Rogeriee Thompson in Franchina v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
Rogeriee Thompson in Franchina v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:53 pm
The April 3, 2019 Supreme Court opinion in Stone v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:51 am
Lest you be shocked by this tiny little gap in Mr. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:42 am
” The court said the penalty imposed did not “shock its sense of fairness,” and sustained the commissioner’s determination.* See Von Essen v NYC Civil Service Commission, 3 A.D.3d 115 and Von Essen v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Here is a brief excerpt from the archival record of the case:"City of Harrodsburg v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:32 pm
Aged 18, in August 2000, both Venables and Thompson applied to have that anonymity injunction extended to provide protection into their adult lives. 2001 injunction Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, then President of the Family Division, considered those applications in Venables v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2001] Fam 430. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Don Thompson of the AP has this story. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:40 am
District Judge James V. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 6:12 am
Microsoft complaint immediately brings two spectacular (or, from the perspective of true innovators, shocking) patent damages verdicts to mind:this month's $2.175 billion verdict in VLSI v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
The cert petition in Maples v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
All of that may change, though, depending on the outcome of Connick v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
