Search for: "Thomson SA"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2015, 8:03 pm
All practice, no theory.Copyright Litigation Handbook (Thomson Reuters Westlaw 2014-2015) by Raymond J. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm
Thomson Reuters Canada Limited, 2014 ONSC 1288 IMAX Corp. v. [read post]
Yawn: amicus briefs in support of Google's API copyright petition to the Supreme Court have surfaced
7 Nov 2014, 11:51 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States is concerned with proper interpretation of what Congress decides, and not with making policy judgments for Congress.I'm not going to discuss the frequently-cited SAS Institute v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
He is coauthor of six-volume Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure (5th ed., Thomson-West, St. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
For example:Case C‑136/02 P, Mag Instrument v OHIM used to be [2004] ECR I‑9165 but it's now EU:C:2004:592Case C‑25/05 P, Storck v OHIM used to be [2006] I-5719 but it's now EU:C:2006:422Case C‑106/03 P, Vedial v OHIM used to be [2004] ECR I-9573 but it's now EU:C:2004:611 He was a bit disconcerted by this, for a number of reasons, including these:He's not sure what happened to the old citations and wonders if they're still validIt's… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:13 pm
Socata SAS, 924 F. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Thomson Reuters Canada Limited 2014 ONSC 1288[94] Of course, a class action settlement is not approved because it is an excellent result from the perspective of the representative plaintiff, defendant, and class counsel. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
“We understand that sponsoring a relative can be a complicated process at the best of times,” said Catherine Sas, a lawyer involved in the program. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 7:20 am
Tintin is part of the collective memory today as well as his sidekicks, such as Thomson and Thompson, Professor Calculus and Snowy [known to this Kat as Dupont and Dupond, Prof. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:35 pm
By way of background, the Complainants in this investigation are Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC (collectively, “Thomson”), and the Respondents are Chimei InnoLux Corp. and InnoLux Corp. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:38 pm
By way of background, the Complainants in this matter are Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC (collectively, “Thomson”), and the Respondents are Chimei Innolux Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Innolux Corp. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:53 am
By way of background, the Complainants in this matter are Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC and the Respondents are Chimei Innolux Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Innolux Corp. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 4:52 pm
(collectively, “CMI”) moved to strike portions of expert reports served by Complainants Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC (collectively, “Thomson”). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:17 am
According to Stephen Thomson, the attorney acting on behalf of Lew Geffen, this was on a technicality. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
: Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer (World Trademark Review) (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) Copyright protection should apply to functions of computer programs, software company claims in ECJ case: SAS v World Programming (Out-Law) How do you solve a problem like Orphan Works? [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:27 pm
Complainants Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC opposed the motion and argued that CMI sought to do exactly what ALJ Rogers warned the parties they could not do – reopen their cases because they forgot to offer an exhibit into evidence. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:14 pm
In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted-in-part and denied-in-part Complainants Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC’s (collectively, “Thomson”) motion to strike untimely prior art contentions and related portions of expert reports. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
(wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Anglo-Dutch publishing giant Reed Elsevier and Canadian mega-conglomerate Thomson Reuters, respectively). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
’s (collectively, “CMI”) motion to compel Complainants Thomson Licensing SAS and Thomson Licensing LLC (collectively, “Thomson”) to produce certain documents allegedly withheld by Thomson as protected attorney-client communications and attorney work product. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Limited v Werit UK Limited, Protechna SA (jiplp) PCC Page 28: Stretching tentacles – having designs on costs: Cautious Co and IPOff Ltd (PatLit) Court tells Kats, tail must not wag dog: EWCA (Civ) decision in Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL. [read post]
