Search for: "Thorpe v. Thorpe" Results 61 - 80 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2010, 1:11 am
After a short hiatus due to the election and certain technical problems, Natasha and I return to discuss the case of JKN v JCN and Lord Justice Thorpe's comments in the case of C (Children).You can listen to the LoreCast here. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:18 am
In Richardson v Richardson [2011] EWCA Civ 79, decided today, the husband appealed against a final ancillary relief order on the basis of subsequent events.The order was made on 25 September 2009, dividing the matrimonial assets as to 47.5% to the wife and 52.5% to the husband. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
The tweet was therefore not defamatory, and so Ms Thorp abandoned her claim. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:35 am by National Indian Law Library
Thorpe (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act)Bristol Bay Area Health Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 10:11 am by Native American Rights Fund
Borough of Thorpe (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, definition of museum)Becker v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:11 am
As Lord Justice Thorpe said giving the leading judgment, the case itself was comparatively simple. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 10:04 am
Her appeal to the circuit judge was refused, and she appealed to the Court of Appeal.The Decision: Lord Justice Thorpe dealt quite summarily with the remarriage trap point, which had been raised by the circuit judge, who was concerned that she was seeking an order against herself. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
On 25 August 2023, the Court of Appeal Nicola Davies, Arnold and Warby LJJ) handed down judgment in Blake & ors v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
From running touchdowns to running away with the casket: Thorpe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 11:00 pm
If ever there is to be a paradigm case in which the court will look to the pre-nuptial agreement as not simply one of the peripheral factors of the case, but as a factor of magnetic importance, it seems to me that this is just such a case.So said Lord Justice Thorpe in the Court of Appeal yesterday, in the case of Crossley v Crossley. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
The thorny and increasingly important issue of jurisdiction went before the Court of Appeal earlier this month in Bush v Bush [2008] EWCA Civ 865.The Facts: The parties were married in London in April 1988 and went to live in Tanzania in 1991 or 1992. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:08 pm by Ben Cheng
The petition of the day is: Continental Insurance Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:22 pm
The recent case of Milton v Milton [2008] EWCA Civ 926 gives useful guidance upon the issue of how long should be allowed for payment of a lump sum.The Facts: On the 6th December 2007 District Judge Brasse made a clean break order requiring Mrs Milton to pay Mr Milton a lump sum of £60,000 within 36 months. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am by CMS
Justice Munby, in agreement with Lord Justice Thorpe’s comments, stated that the rule has a “baleful effect” and that “something should be done to amend rule 3.17 with a view to implementing Lord Justice Thorpe’s wise proposals”. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:09 am
(The property had already been sold by the time of the trial.)Lord Justice Lewison therefore allowed the appeal, and remitted the matter to the County Court to determine issues of quantum.Lord Justice Thorpe and Lord Justice Etherton gave concurring judgments. [read post]