Search for: "Tibbetts v. Tibbetts"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2022, 7:00 am
Further, said the court, a written agreement that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms", citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344 and other decisions. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 7:00 am
Further, said the court, a written agreement that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms", citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344 and other decisions. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Thus, the reimbursements were "retiree health insurance benefits that were voluntarily conferredas a matter of school district policy" (Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, 358). [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Thus, the reimbursements were "retiree health insurance benefits that were voluntarily conferredas a matter of school district policy" (Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, 358). [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Thus, the reimbursements were "retiree health insurance benefits that were voluntarily conferredas a matter of school district policy" (Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, 358). [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Thus, the reimbursements were "retiree health insurance benefits that were voluntarily conferredas a matter of school district policy" (Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, 358). [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
., Appellants, v Andrew M. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
., Appellants, v Andrew M. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Kolbe v Tibbetts, we left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Kolbe v Tibbetts, we left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
., Appellants, v Andrew M. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
., Appellants, v Andrew M. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm
We thought of this in regard to Clarington v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
* See Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
* See Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"Citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d at page 353, the Appellate Division noted that CBA language in Kolbe provided for retiree benefits "that continued beyond the expiration of the CBA", explaining that the relevant language in the Kolbe CBA provided that "[t]he coverage provided [in retirement] shall be the coverage which is in effect for the unit at such time as the employee retires". [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
"Citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, the Appellate Division observed that whether a provision in a collective bargaining agreement "is ambiguous is a question of law and extrinsic evidence may not be considered unless the document itself is ambiguous. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
"Citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, the Appellate Division observed that whether a provision in a collective bargaining agreement "is ambiguous is a question of law and extrinsic evidence may not be considered unless the document itself is ambiguous. [read post]
