Search for: "Tillman v. Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
The Andrew Johnson administration understood [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am by Josh Blackman
I ultimately did not answer this question, but said the question was open under Walter Nixon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Introduction. [read post]