Search for: "Tinder v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold a trial starting November 6. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
Wilkinson is Microsoft's renewed motion to dismiss: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The motion proposes an evidentiary hearing over this issue.This is only the latest example of United States et al. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:02 am
[COMMENT: The Commission issued the SO right before the Epic Games v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am
By coincidence, that was the day the United States Department of Justice and eight state AGs filed a second Unite States et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:39 pm
The United States Congress has practically concluded its 117th term without passing the Open App Markets Act (OAMA) into law. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had entered the following order on Tuesday (November 15):"The request by plaintiffs Epic and Match to file amended complaints, [...], is granted. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:40 am
Apple judgment by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 11:32 pm
The slightly postponed Epic Games v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm
In Epic Games v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:29 am
Match Group has been named as a defendant in litigation relating to its billing and subscription practices filed by multiple California District Attorneys relating to such practices, People of State of California v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 11:20 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has granted Apple an extension until July 15 for its final brief, which in formal terms is only supposed to reinforce Apple's appeal of Epic's consolation prize from the district court (an injunction under California Unfair Competition Law) but which Apple will try to use in order to make some final points even on the more important issues in the case.There are two reasons for which Epic lost (apart from the… [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
One of them is Match Group (best known for Tinder). [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:51 am
Techs., LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:05 am
That was a clear allusion to FTC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 10:57 pm
"Apple's smartphone market share in the Netherlands (26%) is far lower than in the United States, and the Dutch ACM very appropriately explains that mobile app developers are facing an Apple-Google duopoly (without using that term--at least I couldn't find in the summary).Finally, here's the Coring v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm
This is the second major loss for the Epic-Spotify-Tinder Coalition for App Fairness this month. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:49 pm
His commentary on Epic v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
