Search for: "Tinder v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm
Here is a summary of the plaintiff's allegations, from Judge Liam O'Grady's opinion denying a motion to dismiss: Plaintiff is a retired Senior Master Sergeant in the United States Air Force ("SMSgt. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm
United States, 3 CIT 219 (1982). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:18 am
Tex. 2000); see also Tinder v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:29 am
Match Group has been named as a defendant in litigation relating to its billing and subscription practices filed by multiple California District Attorneys relating to such practices, People of State of California v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Graffiti was sprayed on the front gates and intercom unit, with the house sign beside it defaced with red spray paint. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
Corruption swirled around the highest levels of the United States and of China. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm
In Epic Games v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had entered the following order on Tuesday (November 15):"The request by plaintiffs Epic and Match to file amended complaints, [...], is granted. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
One of them is Match Group (best known for Tinder). [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 10:57 pm
"Apple's smartphone market share in the Netherlands (26%) is far lower than in the United States, and the Dutch ACM very appropriately explains that mobile app developers are facing an Apple-Google duopoly (without using that term--at least I couldn't find in the summary).Finally, here's the Coring v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:02 am
[COMMENT: The Commission issued the SO right before the Epic Games v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 11:32 pm
The slightly postponed Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:39 pm
The United States Congress has practically concluded its 117th term without passing the Open App Markets Act (OAMA) into law. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:40 am
Apple judgment by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:23 am
The United States has been quite reluctant to respond to sexual fraud in modern history even in the tort setting. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 10:14 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:52 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has since clarified this position in Riley v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:36 am
Again, I wasn't initially sold, but I watched the further developments with an open mind and less than a year later I think--in light of the recent announcement by three United States Senators--that the CAF may go down in history as one of the most impactful and important policy efforts in the history of the tech industry.The tide has turned. [read post]
