Search for: "Tobias v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2023, 8:55 am
As a case study, we consider Pulsifer v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Justice Barrett recently argued in Biden v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 6:00 am
As a case study, we consider Pulsifer v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:04 am
In this post, Karishma Gadhia, an associate in the litigation and arbitration team at CMS and Tobias Seger, a trainee at CMS, comment on the decision handed down in early November 2020 by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Secretary of State for Health and others v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 44. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
By Tobias Thienel A recent case in the English courts - until now the High Court and the Court of Appeal - has raised absolutely central points about the act of state doctrine, and in so doing has neatly explained the doctrine. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
In this post, Tobias Seger, an Associate at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in Guest v Guest [2022] UKSC 27, handed down by the Supreme Court on 19 October 2022. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm
By Tobias ThienelThe Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has recently heard oral argument in the case of Bayatyan v Armenia. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
In Biden v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:31 am
By Tobias ThienelThis morning, 11 years and one day after 9/11, the European Court of Human Rights has delivered its judgment in Nada v Switzerland. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:31 am
By Tobias Thienel This morning, 11 years and one day after 9/11, the European Court of Human Rights has delivered its judgment in Nada v Switzerland. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:22 pm
By Tobias ThienelToday, the European Court of Human Rights - by a Chamber - delivered judgment in the case of Khodorkovskiy v Russia. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:17 pm
Tobias Barrington Wolff (University of Pennsylvania Law School) has posted Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sensible Pragmatism in Federal Jurisdictional Policy (Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 839-864, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:18 am
SUBTITLE: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:34 pm
In that, the case is a lot like Rantsev v Cyprus and Russia and Siliadin v France (which the judge duly applied). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am
By Tobias Thienel(It's also a great film, but never mind that)This, more or less, is the holding of a recent case in the European Court of Human Rights, Otegi Mondragon v Spain. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:31 pm
Harting, Munich case no. 21 O 16782/20), andC-182/21 for the SEP case (Nokia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 7:48 am
Supreme Court held execution of incompetent people unconstitutional in the 1986 Ford v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:44 am
By Tobias ThienelIt's a good day for human rights law because the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has today delivered its judgments in Al-Skeini and Others v United Kingdom, Al-Jedda v United Kingdom and Bayatyan v Armenia. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:26 pm
Facts In Vallianatos and Others v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 2:40 am
Contents include: Naomi Egel & Steven Ward, Hierarchy, revisionism, and subordinate actors: The TPNW and the subversion of the nuclear order Marius Wishman & Charles Butcher, Beyond ethnicity: historical states and modern conflict Hoo Tiang Boon, International identity construction: China’s pursuit of the responsible power identity and the American Other Tobias Berger, Worldmaking from the margins: interactions between domestic and international ordering in… [read post]
